情侶台北一日遊2016拜託大大幫忙規劃台北一日遊行程台北一日遊行程規劃台北捷運一日遊推薦台北一日遊可以怎麼安排

no copyright intended 是錯誤用法，意思是 『無意有版權』= 放棄版權 = 你可以隨意拿去用，不會侵權

網路上很多沒有常識的人隨意使用，隨意省略。

這問題兩年前就在 Yahoo! Answers 討論指責過了：

People mean "no copyright infringement intended." Not only does the inaccurate phrase show no understanding of what a copyright is, but it's also not a legal excuse for using a copyrighted work without permission -- according to copyright law, whether you give credit to the original author or not, using someone else's work without permission (other than certain exceptions, such as fair use) is copyright infringement.

(http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110922132853AAIzKwS)

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers. Five Filters recommends:

• Massacres That Matter - Part 1 - 'Responsibility To Protect' In Egypt, Libya And Syria
• Massacres That Matter - Part 2 - The Media Response On Egypt, Libya And Syria
• National demonstration: No attack on Syria - Saturday 31 August, 12 noon, Temple Place, London, UK